Evaluating Consolidation Loans as a Debt Management Strategy: A Mixed-Methods Study of Household Indebtedness in South Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64229/twka4b97Keywords:
Household Over-Indebtedness, Consolidation Loans, Predatory Lending, Financial Literacy, Debt ManagementAbstract
Household over-indebtedness has become a defining feature of South Africa’s financial system, with debt-to-income levels at 62.5% and household debt-to-GDP at 33.7% by the end of 2024. Unsecured credit, now exceeding R626 billion, reflects growing reliance on debt for survival rather than asset accumulation. In this context, consolidation loans have been aggressively marketed by major banks as instruments of financial relief, yet their long-term value remains questionable. This study critically examines the role of consolidation loans in addressing household indebtedness, particularly for the middle class. Using a mixed-methods design, it reviews literature and policy reports, conducts interviews with 50 loan applicants and 10 financial consultants, and analyses loan marketing materials. Findings reveal that consolidation loans often exacerbate vulnerability by extending repayment periods, concealing costs, and compounding interest, rather than resolving debt distress. Limited debt literacy further exposes households to financial risks, with consumers spending between 62% and 77% of income on debt repayments and collectively paying R384 billion annually in interest. The study argues that consolidation lending deepens household fragility and reinforces dependency on costly credit. Policy reforms, greater transparency, financial literacy initiatives, and wider social interventions are essential for fostering sustainable debt management and protecting vulnerable households.
References
[1]Adam T, Fernando S. Hedging, Speculation and Shareholder Value. J Financ Econ. 2006;81(2):283-309.
[2]Ahmed H, Azevedo A, Guney Y. The Effect of Hedging on Firm Value and Performance: Evidence from the Nonfinancial UK Firms. J Corp Financ. 2010;18(12):221-237.
[3]Allayannis G, Ihrig J, Weston J. Financial vs. operational strategies. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc. 2005;91:391-395.
[4]Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag. 2001;17:99-120.
[5]Bhole L, Dash P. Industrial Recession in India: Is Interest Rate the cause? Productivity. 2002;43(2):268-277.
[6]Bilson JF, Hsieh DA. The profitability of currency speculation. Int J Forecast. 2008;3(1):115-130.
[7]Blaaw A. Market risk management in Nigeria. United Bank of Africa; 2008.
[8]Bodnar G, Tang C, Weintrop EJ. Both Sides of Corporate Diversification: the Value Impact of Geographical and Industrial Development. NBER Working Paper. 2011;6224.
[9]Boehm TP, Schlottmann A. Mortgage pricing differentials across Hispanic, African-American, and White households: Evidence from the American housing survey. Cityscape. 2007;93-136.
[10]Brigham FE, Ehrhardt CM. Financial Management, Theory & Practice. India: 2002. p. 158, 932.
[11]Brodsky W. The Globalization of Stock Index Futures: A Summary of the Market and Regulatory Developments in Stock Index Futures and the Regulatory hurdles which exist for Foreign Stock Index Futures in the United States. Northwestern J Int Law Bus. 2010;15(2).
[12]Carter D, Rogers D, Simkins B. Does hedging affect firm value? Evidence from the US airline industry. Financ Manag. 2006;Spring:53-86.
[13]Carter D, Rodgers DA, Simkins B. Does fuel Hedging make Economic sense? The case of US airline Industry. J Financ Web. 2003;December.
[14]Craig F. The Treynor Capital Asset Pricing Model. J Invest Manag. 2003;1(2).
[15]Cumby RE, Obstfeld M. A note on Exchange Rate Expectations and Nominal Interest Differentials: A Test of the Fisher Hypothesis. J Finance. 2009;5:697-703.
[16]Dhanani A, Fifield S, Helliar C, Stevenson L. Why UK Companies Hedge Interest Rate Risk. Stud Econ Financ. 2007;24:72-90.
[17]Deutsche Borse Group. The Global derivatives market: An Introduction. 2014. Available from: http://www.math.nyu.edu/faculty/avellane
[18]Elahi A, Dehdashti R. Classification of Researches and Evolving a Consolidation Typology of Management Studies. London: The Center for Innovations in Business and Management Practice; 2011.
[19]Fauver L, Naranjo A. Derivative Usage and Firm Value: The Influence of Agency Costs and Monitoring Problems. J Corp Financ. 2010;16:719-735.
[20]Giddy IH. Exchange Risk Whose view? Financ Manag. 2010;8:23-33.
[21]Goselin MA. Central bank performance under inflation targeting. [Place: Publisher?]. 2007.
[22]Gutierrez E. Inflation performance and constitutional Central Bank Independence: Evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean. IMF; 2003.
[23]Krause S, Rioja F. Financial Development and Monetary Policy Efficiency. 2006. Available from: http://www.bankofcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/gosselin.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Brian Basvi, Moryden Moven Komboni (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.