Internet Penetration, Institutional Quality and Bilateral Trade between Nigeria and China

Authors

  • David Igbadoo Anum Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Federal University Lafia, Nasarawa State, Nigeria Author
  • Ilemona Adofu Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Federal University Lafia, Nasarawa State, Nigeria Author
  • Obadiah Jonathan Gimba Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Federal University Lafia, Nasarawa State, Nigeria Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64229/h3nw5e05

Keywords:

Internet penetration, Institutional quality, Bilateral trade, Gravity model, Nigeria-China trade, Governance

Abstract

This paper examines whether internet penetration (INT) is associated with Nigeria-China bilateral trade and whether institutional quality is separately associated with bilateral trade relations, using an augmented gravity framework and annual data for 2015-2025. The analysis uses 52 country-year observations (26 per country) a small sample that limits statistical power and is treated throughout as a key limitation of the study, governance measures from the six World Governance Indicators (WGI), UN Comtrade mirror statistics for trade, and Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) subscriber data for digital connectivity. The manuscript was revised in 2026 using full-year 2025 data that had already been released by NCC and UN Comtrade at the time of writing; the 2025 observations are therefore treated as the final observed year in the data-set rather than as forecasts. Panel and country-dis-aggregated regressions show a positive and statistically significant association between INT and bilateral trade. Control of Corruption is also positively associated with trade, while Rule of Law and Regulatory Quality have negative coefficients that are interpreted cautiously because the six WGI indicators are closely correlated. The results are sensitive to whether Chinese- or Nigerian-reported trade values are used, underscoring the importance of mirror-statistics discrepancies and trade-data quality. Given the short annual panel and the small sample, the estimates should be interpreted as conditional associations rather than causal effects or precisely estimated long-run parameters. The paper concludes that digital infrastructure and governance reform should be pursued as complementary policy priorities and that improved trade-data systems are essential for reliable measurement of Nigeria-China trade.

References

[1]Wang Y, Gao H, Wang H. The digital silk road and trade growth__A quasi-natural experiment based on silk road E-commerce. Research in International Business and Finance, 2024, 67, 102140. DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102140

[2]Abejide TS, Talibu O, Aghalino S. Nigeria-China trade relations: Oil resource in focus, 1990s-2020. AEGIS Journal of International Relations, 2024, 8(2), 1-17. DOI: 10.33021/aegis.v8i2.5521.

[3]Eneji MA, Onyinye IJ, Kennedy DN, Rong S. Impact of foreign trade and investment on Nigeria’s textile industry: The case of China. Journal of African Studies and Development, 2012, 4, 130-141. DOI: 10.5897/JASD12.004

[4]Feldstein S. The rise of digital repression: How technology is reshaping power, politics, and resistance. Oxford University Press, 2021. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190057497.001.0001

[5]Alhassan A, Payaslioglu C. Institutions and bilateral trade in Africa: An application of Poisson’s estimation with high-dimensional fixed effects to structural gravity model. Applied Economics Letters, 2020, 27(16), 1357-1361. DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2019.1682112

[6]Liu L, Nath HK. Information and communications technology and trade in emerging market economies. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2013, 49(6), 67-87. DOI: 10.2753/REE1540-496X490605

[7]International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Measuring Digital Development: Facts and Figures 2019. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union, 2019.

[8]Pradhan RP, Arvin MB, Nair MS, Hall JH, Bennett SE. Sustainable economic development in India: The dynamics between financial inclusion, ICT development, and economic growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021, 169, 120758. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120758

[9]Hjort J, Tian L. The economic impact of internet connectivity in developing countries. Annual Review of Economics, 2025, 17, 99-124. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-economics-081224-102352

[10]Kozol E. Determinants of financial inclusion: A panel data analysis of global trends, digital finance and policy implications. Digital Finance, 2026, 8(1), 1-30. DOI: 10.1007/s42521-025-00170-3

[11]Rodrik D. Premature industrialization. Journal of Economic Growth, 2016, 21(1), 1-33. DOI: 10.1007/s10887-015-9122-3

[12]Li W, Abiad V. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2009. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1416542.

[13]Acemoglu D, Robinson JA. Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Business, 2012.

[14]UN Comtrade. United Nations International Trade Statistics Database: Nigeria-China bilateral trade flows and commodity classifications. United Nations Statistics Division, 2018.

[15]Portugal-Perez A, Wilson JS. Export performance and trade facilitation reform: Hard and soft infrastructure. World Development, 2012, 40(7), 1295-1307. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.12.002

[16]World Bank. World Development Indicators and Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI). World Bank Group, 2019.

[17]Tinbergen J. Shaping the world economy: Suggestions for an international economic policy. The Twentieth Century Fund, 1962.

[18]Anderson JE. A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. The American Economic Review, 1979, 69(1), 106-116.

[19]Anderson JE, van Wincoop E. Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review, 2003, 93(1), 170-192. DOI: 10.1257/000282803321455214

[20]Williamson OE. The economic institutions of capitalism. Firms, markets, relational contracting. Das Summa Summarum des Management: Die 25 wichtigsten Werke für Strategie, Führung und Veränderung. Wiesbaden: Gabler, 1985, 61-75. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-8349-9320-5_6

[21]Macher JT, Richman BD. Transaction cost economics: An assessment of empirical research in the social sciences. Business and Politics, 2008, 10(1), 1-63. DOI: 10.2202/1469-3569.1210

[22]Castells M.The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishers, 2000.

[23]Muijs D, West M, Ainscow M. Why network? Theoretical perspectives on networking and collaboration between schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2010, 21(1), 5-26. DOI: 10.1080/09243450903569692

[24]Helgason M. Institutional quality and economic growth__A comparison across development stages. Lund University, 2010.

[25]Agarwal P, Mba-Kalu S, Tayo T, Oladapo A. Developing a digital trade strategy in Nigeria. ODI Global Report, 2025.

[26]Ibrahim KH, Sar DW, Handoyo RD. Nigeria-China bilateral trade relations: Is there market opportunities in China? Intermestic: Journal of International Studies, 2020, 4(2), 139-160. DOI: 10.24198/intermestic.v4n2.3

[27]Dossou TAM, Kambaye EN, Berhe MW, Asongu SA. Moderating effect of ICT on the relationship between governance quality and income inequality in sub-Saharan Africa. Information Development, 2025, 41(2), 445-464. DOI: 10.1177/02666669231170396

[28]Tay C. The impact of the internet on trade in education. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 2015, 21(6), 833-854. DOI: 10.3846/20294913.2015.1108941

[29]Wang Y, Wang Y, Lee SH. The effect of cross-border e-commerce on China’s international trade: An empirical study based on transaction cost analysis. Sustainability, 2017, 9(11), 2028. DOI: 10.3390/su9112028

[30]Iyoboyi M, Olarinde MO, Abdulsalam SA. The institutional and policy environment and the quest for industrialization in Nigeria. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 2016, 8(2), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v8i2(J).1251

[31]Mendez-Parra M, Balchin N, Calabrese, L, Onyeka K. Nigeria and UK bilateral trade and investment: Diagnostic, identification of constraints and recommendations. Overseas Development Institute, 2019.

[32]Wahab BA. Trade-related infrastructure and bilateral trade flows: Evidence from Nigeria and its trading partners. Journal of Economic Structures, 2024, 13, 13. DOI: 10.1186/s40008-024-00332-3

[33]Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RP. Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1999, 94(446), 621-634. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1999.10474156

Downloads

Published

2026-08-27

How to Cite

David Igbadoo Anum, Ilemona Adofu, & Obadiah Jonathan Gimba. (2026). Internet Penetration, Institutional Quality and Bilateral Trade between Nigeria and China. Integrated Economies and Policy Insights, 2(1), 51-61. https://doi.org/10.64229/h3nw5e05